marginally significantp = 0.0578
There was a marginally significant interaction of stimulus familiarity and participant group, F (2, 54) = 3.01, p = 0.0578.
There was a marginally significant interaction of stimulus familiarity and participant group, F (2, 54) = 3.01, p = 0.0578.
However, ASIBs showed a shorter latency N290 response to objects than faces, whereas LR infants showed a trend of responses in the opposite direction ( McCleery et al., 2009 ).