marginally significantp = .06
This did not interact significantly with accuracy ( p = .51), but the interaction with target type was marginally significant ( p = .06).
This did not interact significantly with accuracy ( p = .51), but the interaction with target type was marginally significant ( p = .06).
The interaction with target type in predicting RT approached significance (β = -.02, SE = .01, χ 2 (1) = 3.00, p = .083), however simple effects analyses conducted separately at each target type showed that pupil dilation was not a significant predictor for either Easy ( p = .69) or Difficult ( p = .91) trials alone.