of marginal significancep = 0.066
Note that the impairment effect in Experiment 1 should be interpreted with caution since it is only of marginal significance (p = 0.066).
Note that the impairment effect in Experiment 1 should be interpreted with caution since it is only of marginal significance (p = 0.066).
The high-performers, however, exhibited a marginally significant decline in VWM performance (t(11) = 2.039, p = 0.066) from the sham condition (5.405; std err = 0.225) to the in-phase theta tACS condition (5.010; std err = 0.29).