Facial expression recognition as a candidate marker for autism spectrum disorder: how frequent and severe are deficits?

Results Case-control comparisons showed highly significant mean group differences for accuracy ( p = 1.1 × 10 − 10 ), with an effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.6), more than twice as large as the mean effect size reported in a previous meta-analysis (Uljarevic and Hamilton, 2012, J Autism Dev Disord ).

also in 132,142 other papers

In the TD group, there was a marginally significant relationship between accuracy scores and FIQ ( r (52) = .26, p = .057), such that participants with higher intelligence also had higher expression recognition scores.

also in 26,082 other papers

Although a similar pattern was found in the ASD group, it did not reach statistical significance (ASD r (25) = .29, p = .16).

also in 111,027 other papers