highly significantp < 0.01
The frequency of emesis was lower in the IVP group (8.8%) than in the control groups (50.0% and 31.6%), and the magnitude of difference was clinically relevant and highly significant ( p < 0.01).
The frequency of emesis was lower in the IVP group (8.8%) than in the control groups (50.0% and 31.6%), and the magnitude of difference was clinically relevant and highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Non-parametric analyses are relevant since distribution of the GCS data approached significance from normality in the RMANCOVA analysis ( p = 0.088; Table 6 ).