'Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?': observations on how peer review panels function.

Res Integr Peer Rev · 2017 · PMC5803633 · PMID 29451548

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

quite significantno p-value reported

Personal conflict During the QUT research process, there was considerable personal conflict experienced by some panel members of the Basic Sciences group and there was consensus that personal conflict has a quite significant impact on the group dynamic as a whole and can directly influence the grading given to grants.

also in 5,695 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.