“quite significant”

In addition, difference in mean follow-up period between two groups was quite significant (87.1 months versus 65.9 months, p = 0.000) so that it could possibly give rise to another source of bias in aneurysm regrowth.

The two partial correlations were both quite significant ( f versus txn rate/tlns per mRNA | protein production rate, complex membership: Spearman partial r = 0.227, n = 4,746, p = 10 −57 ; complex membership versus txn rate/tlns per mRNA | protein production rate, f: Spearman partial r = 0.147, n = 4,746, p = 10 −24 ), suggesting that fitness effect and protein complex membership are independently associated with the expression strategy that minimizes stochastic fluctuation.

In the case of the topoisomerase II inhibitors, 12% of the etoposide-associated CNVs were found to associate with daunorubicin IC 50 , and the observed overlap is still quite significant ( P = 2.7 × 10 -10 ).

For example, of the 559 genes in the Chen androgen signature (448 of which were represented in at least three prostate tumor datasets), 29 were correlated ( p <0.05) with KLK3 in at least three out of the four prostate tumor datasets; by chance, nine were expected, and so the amount of actual overlap was quite significant ( p = 1.2E-08).

The results show that TPSA is quite significant ( p -value = 4.1 × 10 − 8 ).

For BRCA2 both ER and grade were highly significant predictors of mutation status, and the interaction of ER and grade was also quite significant (χ 2 = 28.3, 2 df , P <10 -6 ).

However, for BOS of the HP, a detached curve of exercised from sedentary mice is visible on the graph and the effect of exercise is quite significant during all the period studied (Fig. 5 f; p < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA).

The difference in AGLA expression by FA concentration was quite significant (F (5,12) = 20.58, p < 0.0001).

The CaG(Pol/Ag) nanomatrices synthesised by two different methods has shown quite significant ( p < 0.0001) anti-cancer activity in increase concentration dependant manner.

Since Mdm2 heterozygosity greatly delays tumor development in Arf -null mice that have both alleles of p53 , the difference in mean survival between p53+/+ and the p53+/− Arf -null Mdm2+/− mice was much larger than their Mdm2 wild-type counterparts and quite significant (p<0.0001, log-rank test; Fig. 2B , Table 1 ).

The critical SII value was 3.40, with SII range between 0–3.40, SII rose by 1 unit, the OAB decreased by 0.25 (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.55–1.01, P = 0.06); when the range of SII was ≥ 3.40, the relationship between SII and OAB was quite significant (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04–1.09, P < 0.0001).

The linear regression analysis of the hospital stay relative to operator experience was quite significant statistically (p<0.0001) ( Figure 5 ).

The authors claimed that survival decreased by 0.6%/d and pelvic control decreased by 0.7%/d for each additional day of treatment beyond 55 days for all stages of disease. Similarly, a study conducted by Lanciano et al 9 demonstrated a quite significant decrease in survival ( p = 0.0001) and pelvic control ( p = 0.0001) as the OTT increased from less than 6, 6 to 7.9, 8 to 9.9, and greater than 10 weeks.

The increase in the image intensity of globus pallidus was quite significant between healthy controls and HE patients ( p < 0.0001 ) .

These correlations were, however, quite significant at occipital electrodes: (meditation—O1, r = 0.77, P = 0.0001, O2, r = 0.71, P = 0.002; control—O1, r = 0.79, P = 0.0001, O2, r = 0.75, P = 0.001.

4 b1 , p = .14) and was quite significant for i.v . delivery (Fig. 4 b2 , p = 1.07 × 10 −4 ).

Similar to mid-term mortality, subgroup analysis showed that LVEF improvement was quite significant in levosimendan vs. placebo subgroups (mean difference: 5.65%, 95%CI: 2.72–8.57%, P=0.0002, I 2 =33%) ( Figure 4 ).

In Table 1 , the crude ratio of acute pancreatitis between the 2 groups were compared using Chi-squared tests, which is quite significant ( P = 0.0003).

In the chronic phase, VA differences became quite significant ( p < 0.001) with an average VA of 0.75 Snellen in Group 2.

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin was 0.92, and the Bartlett test results were quite significant (χ 2 = 4337.71, df = 78, p < 0.001).

Confirming that absenteeism trends change over time, especially during and following the COVID-19 epidemic, the year variable is also quite significant (F = 15.796, p < 0.001); partial η 2 = 0.028.

The meta-analysis's findings demonstrated that PRP may considerably reduce DFU healing times when compared to traditional therapy, and the difference was quite significant ( p < 0.001). 10 In a randomized, double-blind study, Driver et al. 21 investigated the effectiveness of PRP treatment for DFU.

Although the n number included in the training set (n = 44) and test set (n = 11) was limited, it was quite significant with AUC = 0.800 (95% CI 0.40–1.00, p < 0.001), sensitivity 1.00, and specificity 0.80 (Fig. 5 ).

Combination therapy decreased the rate of pyuria to 38.5% which was quite significant ( P = 0.001).

The analysis of the results in Table 5 shows that, in the GRP, negative life events, self-esteem, and satisfaction with social support explain 38.0% of the variance in the levels of suicidal ideation, with the contribution of negative life events being positive and quite significant ( p ≤ 0.001).