borderline significantp = 0.06
There was also a borderline significant main effect of VWM capacity ( F (1,34) = 3.6, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.096) showing that the low VWM capacity participants received the greatest benefit.
There was also a borderline significant main effect of VWM capacity ( F (1,34) = 3.6, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.096) showing that the low VWM capacity participants received the greatest benefit.
No other main effects or interactions approached significance ( F s < 1, p > 0.2 for set size, set size × VWM capacity, and montage × set size × VWM capacity, montage × set size).