a nonsignificant trendP =0.1
We also found a nonsignificant trend toward increased risk of in‐hospital repeated revascularization in the aprotinin group (7 [1.3%] versus 2 [0.4%]; OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 0.73–17.1; P =0.1).
We also found a nonsignificant trend toward increased risk of in‐hospital repeated revascularization in the aprotinin group (7 [1.3%] versus 2 [0.4%]; OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 0.73–17.1; P =0.1).
Aprotinin was also associated with an increased risk of intra‐aortic balloon pump insertion (37 [6.9%] versus 17 [3.2%]; OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.26–4.07; P =0.006) and AKI (102 [19.0%] versus 76 [14.2%]; OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.03–1.97; P =0.03), although the increased risk of renal replacement therapy in the aprotinin group did not reach statistical significance (25 [4.7%] versus 18 [3.4%]; OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.75–2.61; P =0.27).