How social exclusion modulates social information processing: A behavioural dissociation between facial expressions and gaze direction.

PLoS One · 2018 · PMC5884539 · PMID 29617410

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

almost reached statistical significanceno p-value reported

Regarding our third hypothesis about an effect of gender differences [ 34 ] (see [ 36 ] for an example of the different effects of ostracism), our results showed that a difference between male and female participants in exclusion effects emerged clearly on both Accuracy and RTs in Experiment 2, while it almost reached statistical significance on Accuracy data in Experiment 1.

also in 378 other papers

close to the level of significanceno p-value reported

The only effect approaching statistical significance and including Gender was as follows: Gender * Exclusion: χ 2 (1) = 3.591, p = .058 [p-value close to the level of significance].

also in 96 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.