“close to the level of significance”

In a minority of cases (4/80) that were previously close to the level of significance ( p < 0.05), the results of statistical tests changed from significant to not significant or vice versa.

In terms of rotational errors, the t ‐test shows that the difference in the R x direction is close to the level of significance ( t = −1.95, p = 0.051), indicating that the error differences in the R x direction between the two groups are small but exhibit a certain trend.

Table 4 shows that the mean and mean rank of the first preceptors’ indicator (concisely covered all aspects of history taking) were 4.23 and 34.48, respectively, in the SNAPPS group, compared with 3.83 and 26.52, respectively, of the control group but the difference was close to the level of significance (p = 0.055).

Patients with diabetes were less likely to have an excellent outcome compared to non-excellent in univariate analysis, but this association disappeared after adjustment for age and sex, with a P -value close to the level of significance ( P = 0.055) ( Tables 4 and 5 ).

Of all the opportunistic infections and noncommunicable diseases evaluated, only a history of oral candidiasis was close to the level of significance ( P = 0.08) in relation to VF.

The difference in the STT-ACE came close to the level of significance ( p = 0.086) and to the threshold for acceptable discriminative accuracy (AUC = 0.68).

Once more, the determined difference in the anti-SSB/La antibody positivity rate was situated close to the level of significance ( p = 0.09) when comparing these patients with the rest of the study population.

The glucose_diff variable shows a small effect (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00–1.06) and is also close to the level of significance ( p = 0.090). 4.

A decrease was also noted in EDV (close to the level of significance).

It is important to highlight that the association we found was slightly close to the level of significance and it merits careful attention, given that in the competing risk analysis, we did not find such a relationship.

However, for the bagged fetal remains, the mean soil temperature had a p -value (0.06) close to the level of significance (α = 0.05) that suggests it may have had some influence on the bone bioerosion observed for this deposition.

For lead (Pb), the p value of 0.051 is close to the level of significance, which may suggest that the differences in the levels of this element may be significant; however, at the level of 0.05, the result is ambiguous.

I 2 value of 97.89% (p < 0.001) indicated a high degree of consistency between the studies, and an Egger’s value of -6.963 (p=0.06), suggesting that there was no significant publication bias but close to the level of significance, the potential possibility of bias needs to be considered with caution.

However, as p is close to the level of significance, and to further scrutinize the results, univariate testing was inspected (e.g., Lautenbach et al., 2016 ).

Similarly, precursor forms of mature miRNAs miR-455-5p and miR-24-2-5p did not exert a significant rhythmic pattern; however, P was very close to the level of significance cut-off.

Although the P-value for tumor diameter was slightly above 0.05 (0.058), it was still close to the level of significance.

Moreover, the p -value for the lack-of-fit test is close to the level of significance, and the F-value for the lack of fit is many times lower than for model factors, which indicates a small model error.

In terms of the simulation-based estimation of the false positive rate estimates, all methods showed similar rates which were close to the level of significance α of 0.05 ( Figure 7C ). 4.

The 95% CrI of the interaction coefficient for TF was close to the level of significance, suggesting that all 3 interventions (HFNC, CPAP, and BiPAP) may be more effective than COT in infants.

However, this value is quite close to the level of significance of α = 0.05.

In a study aimed at finding associations between interleukin genes and subdomains of negative symptoms in SCZ, calculated based on the Positive and Negative Syndromes Scale, it was found that the association between the IL6 -174G/C (rs1800795) polymorphism and AA scores (avolition and apathy) was close to the level of significance.

There was no significant difference (p=0.056, Mann-Whitney test) between the age range of CFRD-negative (27.7 ± 9.7 years, mean ± S.D., n=19) and CFRD-positive PwCF (34.2 ± 9.1 years, mean ± S.D., n=15) in our cohort, although the p-value was close to the level of significance.

In the crude model, children who frequently consumed candy showed an association with an increased risk of cognitive deficit (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.94∼2.78; p = 0.085), whereas children who frequently consumed biscuits showed an association with a decreased risk of cognitive deficit (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.34∼1.05; p = 0.072), both close to the level of significance.