Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Brain state before a memory probe and associative retrieval in older adults.

Neurobiol Aging · 2018 · PMC5998379 · PMID 29772518

3
hedged sentences
0.0330
closest p · 0.7× alpha
0.0660
boldest claim

The sentences

close to significancep = 0.033actually significant
A within-participants ANOVA incorporating factors of memory and scalp location again revealed main effects of memory [200–1100 ms: F (1, 22) = 7.15, p = 0.014, η p 2 = 0.245; 1100–2000 ms: F (1, 22) = 7.83, p = 0.010, η p 2 = 0.262] and interactions between memory and location that also reached or were close to significance [200–1100 ms: F (1, 22) = 5.19, p = 0.033, η p 2 = 0.191; 1100–2000 ms: F (1, 22) = 4.16, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.159].

also in 2,130 other papers

fell short of significancep = 0.059so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
A mixed-model ANOVA on the data from the 200–2000 ms interval with factors of age (older, younger) and scalp location (all 37 sites) showed significant main effects of age [ F (1, 45) = 6.12, p = 0.017, η p 2 = 0.120] and site [ F (3.2, 143.8) = 6.50, p <0.001, η p 2 = 0.126], and an interaction between the two that just fell short of significance ( p = 0.059).

also in 361 other papers

approached significancep = 0.066so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
No age differences emerged in the later interval, although the memory by group interaction approached significance [ F (1, 45) = 3.55, p = 0.066, η p 2 = 0.073].

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.