Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Exploring the Neuroplastic Effects of Biofeedback Training on Smokers.

Behav Neurol · 2018 · PMC6087614 · PMID 30151058

3
hedged sentences
0.0550
closest p · 1.1× alpha
0.8080
boldest claim

The sentences

nearly reached significancep = 0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
When Fagerström scores at the two time points were recoded into ordinal data according to the test guidelines, differences nearly reached significance ( χ 2 = 5.80; df = 3; p = 0.055; see below Table 1 ).

also in 125 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.808not close (p > 0.1)
However, changes observed in the aforementioned tests when comparing the participants' scores at the two time conditions did not reach statistical significance (BDI II: W = −0.243; p = 0.808; STAI I: W = −0.241; p = 0.809; STAI II: W = −1.590; p = 0.112; Rosenberg: W = −0.607; p = 0.544; Motivation: t = 1.129; df = 26, p = 0.269).

also in 111,027 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported
However, marginally significant differences in the information outflow of two nodes, the right vlPFC and the right TPC, towards the other DMN nodes were indeed found.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.