showed a trendP = .1
For Stroop information‐processing speed, NH controls showed a trend towards being faster than ECI users ( P = .1), and NH participants were significantly faster than CICs ( P = .011).
For Stroop information‐processing speed, NH controls showed a trend towards being faster than ECI users ( P = .1), and NH participants were significantly faster than CICs ( P = .011).
For the CVLT‐II, the effect of group was no longer significant for Total Words Recalled or List B, although it still remained highly significant for Short Delay Recognition.