showed a trendp = 0.12
Osteoid surface to bone surface showed a trend toward a reduction in CRH‐Tg mice ( p = 0.12; Fig. 3 C ), whereas osteoid width was decreased by 27% in CRH‐Tg mice relative to WT mice ( p = 0.002; Fig. 3 D ).
Osteoid surface to bone surface showed a trend toward a reduction in CRH‐Tg mice ( p = 0.12; Fig. 3 C ), whereas osteoid width was decreased by 27% in CRH‐Tg mice relative to WT mice ( p = 0.002; Fig. 3 D ).