marginally significantp = .093
This analysis found a marginally significant effect of block, F (3, 360) = 2.16, p = .093, η p 2 = . 02 ; the main effect of group and the interaction between block and SOA were not significant ( F s < 0.58).
This analysis found a marginally significant effect of block, F (3, 360) = 2.16, p = .093, η p 2 = . 02 ; the main effect of group and the interaction between block and SOA were not significant ( F s < 0.58).
Regarding Stimuli E-H, there was a numerical trend towards higher ratings for the instructed stimuli than the noninstructed stimuli, but it did not reach statistical significance.