The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence.

Finally, while the interaction between agent judgment and dilemma type was only marginally significant, we looked at simple effects regardless and found that across both consequentialist and non-consequentialist participants, people were more likely to cooperate with the non-consequentialist (73%) than the consequentialist agent (57%) in the sacrificial dilemma, x 2 (1) = 6.73, p = .009.

also in 3,878 other papers