close to significanceP = 0.056
Statistically, only the comparison at R2 CpG2 was close to significance ( P = 0.056).
Statistically, only the comparison at R2 CpG2 was close to significance ( P = 0.056).
However, both studies were rather limited in sample size, one had only access to SAT biopsies [ 19 ], or their group comparisons did not reach statistical significance in SAT and VAT, despite an even significant higher body mass index (BMI) in the GDM group [ 20 ].