marginally significantp = 0.085
However, a significant effect of Time-to-Failure reflects that the error rate increased over time, F (9, 522) = 2.43, p = 0.01, and a marginally significant Condition effect suggests that implementation intention participants tended to make more errors than goal intention participants, F (1, 58) = 3.08, p = 0.085 (Fig. 2B ).