highly significantp = 0.03
Interestingly, with 80% cut-off (showing strong pSTAT3 positivity), the correlation was highly significant for the AITL subgroup (HR = 6.2; p = 0.03) but not for the PTCL-NOS (HR = 1.6, p = 0.45) (Fig. 2a ).
Interestingly, with 80% cut-off (showing strong pSTAT3 positivity), the correlation was highly significant for the AITL subgroup (HR = 6.2; p = 0.03) but not for the PTCL-NOS (HR = 1.6, p = 0.45) (Fig. 2a ).
Although, this data did not reach statistical significance, this was likely due to the small sample size in PTPN6 positive and negative groups.