showed a trendP = 0.031
That is, RTs for T2 with angry face distractors were significantly slower than those of T-baseline [MD = 19.6 ms, t (30) = 3.75, P = 0.001], and RTs for T3 with angry face distractor showed a trend level to significant when compared to those of T-baseline [MD = 8.9 ms, t (30) = 2.26, P = 0.031], suggesting significant attentional dwelling effects to the task-irrelevant angry face distractor in the SAD group ( Figure 1B ).