Assessment of proportional hazard assumption in aggregate data: a systematic review on statistical methodology in clinical trials using time-to-event endpoint.

Br J Cancer · 2018 · PMC6288087 · PMID 30420618

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.1010

closest p · 2.0× alpha

0.1010

boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.101not close (p > 0.1)

Ten (83%) studies in which the assumption was violated and 27 (54%) in which the PH was met, had PFS as primary endpoint, but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.101).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.