a strong trendp=0.090
In a landmark analysis between 6 months and 2 years, there was a strong trend for a lower rate of adjusted TLR (0.8% vs 2.0%; adjusted HR, 0.375; 95% CI, 0.121–1.164; p=0.090) with BP-BES than DP-EES, but no difference in TLF ( Figure 4 ).