Disruption of Cerebellar Prediction in Verbal Working Memory.

Front Hum Neurosci · 2019 · PMC6393359 · PMID 30846935

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0800

closest p · 1.6× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The ANOVA also revealed a main effect for stimulation sites ( F (1,22) = 5.393, p = 0.03), with higher error rate in cerebellar stimulation condition, a non-significant main effect for probe position ( F (2,44) = 1.645, p = 0.205), and an interaction effect that approached significance ( F (2,44) = 2.670, p = 0.08).

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.