Structured reports of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in primary endometrial cancer: Potential benefits for clinical decision-making.

PLoS One · 2019 · PMC6433257 · PMID 30908525

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.7080

closest p · 14.2× alpha

0.7080

boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.708not close (p > 0.1)

Whilst satisfaction with content was higher for SRs compared to NSRs, this difference did not reach statistical significance (reader 1: 1.22 vs. 1.17, p = 0.708; reader 2: 1.17 vs. 1.12, p = 0.157; reader 3: 1.14 vs. 1.02, p = 0.059; reader 4: 1.22 vs. 1.17, p = 0.480; reader 5: 1.17 vs. 1.15, p = 0.862) ( Table 1 ).

also in 111,027 other papers

borderline significantno p-value reported

Our study demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference in the number of key features in NSRs compared to SRs, but the difference between them was borderline significant.

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.