Should the outcome of focal photocoagulation for center-sparing diabetic macular edema require expanding the definition of center involvement?

Sci Rep · 2019 · PMC6435706 · PMID 30914722

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Male gender showed a trend towards being more frequent in eyes with visual improvement (53.2% vs. 46.8%, p = 0.06), though it was inconsistent.

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.