Barely Significant
← all excerpts

INVITED SPEAKERS’ ABSTRACTS

J Carcinog · 2016 · PMC6460989

5
hedged sentences
0.1800
closest p · 3.6× alpha
0.4300
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp=0.18not close (p > 0.1)
In case of life style factors,both alcohol consumption (OR=2.45,Chi sq.=9.6,p=0.00) and tobacco chewing(OR=3.79, Chi sq=20.4,p=0.00) showed highly significant correlation with NPC risk whereas smoking(OR=1.48, Chi sq.=1.7,p=0.18) didn’t show any correlation with NPC.

also in 132,142 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep value = 0.43not close (p > 0.1)
However, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p value = 0.43).Further, there was a significant difference in PDGFRa gene expression, between thrombocytopenic and non-thrombocytopenic CML patients (p value = 0.03).

also in 111,027 other papers

extremely significantno p-value reported
Conclusion: LEPR gene K109R showed an extremely significant association with sporadic breast cancer whereas LEPR gene Q223R polymorphism and -2548 G/A LEP gene polymorphism had no effect.

also in 7,787 other papers

an increasing trendno p-value reported
There was an increasing trend for performing PDS:P1-3/56 (5.35%); P2- 8/56 (14.28%),P3 -3/56(5.35%)P4 8/56(14.28%),P5 4/56(7.14%)P6 10/56(17.85%), P7- 20/56 (35.71%).

also in 63,971 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.