marginally significantp = .063
There was also a greater marginally significant satisfaction in women on the items “treatment logic” ( t (86) = 1.88, p = .063; d = 0.47) and “recommending to others” ( t (86) = 1.94, p = .055; d = 0.49).
There was also a greater marginally significant satisfaction in women on the items “treatment logic” ( t (86) = 1.88, p = .063; d = 0.47) and “recommending to others” ( t (86) = 1.94, p = .055; d = 0.49).
The remaining potential predictors did not reach statistical significance.