Analysis of accuracy revealed marginally significant effects for target presence [present: .91 ± .01, absent: .93 ± .01; F (1, 26) = 3.93, p = .058, ŋ 2 p = .13] and for the interaction between condition and target presence, F (1, 26) = 3.89, p = .059, ŋ 2 p = .13, which showed a trend for higher accuracy for safe versus avoidance conditions in target absent trials.
← all excerpts
Punishment-related memory-guided attention: Neural dynamics of perceptual modulation.
1
0.0580
0.0580