Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Testing the Attentional Dwelling Hypothesis of Attentional Capture.

J Cogn · 2018 · PMC6634340 · PMID 31517216

2
hedged sentences
0.0001
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0630
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .0001actually significant
The main effects of cue validity and search type were highly significant, F(1, 23) = 33.7, p < .0001, η 2 p = .59, and F(1, 23) = 298.9, p < .0001, η 2 p = .93, respectively, and so was the interaction between these factors, F(1, 23) = 30.2, p < .0001, η 2 p = .57.

also in 132,142 other papers

approached significancep = .063so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The main effects of compatibility and search type were significant, F(1, 23) = 8.5, p = .0077, η 2 p = .27 and F(1, 23) = 12.2, p = .002, η 2 p = .34, respectively, while the effect of cued distractor difficulty only approached significance, F(1, 23) = 3.8, p = .063, η 2 p = .14.

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.