borderline significancep = 0.04
CMT improved OS with borderline significance (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03–0.89, p = 0.04) compared to RT. 3.4.
CMT improved OS with borderline significance (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03–0.89, p = 0.04) compared to RT. 3.4.
CMT showed a trend toward improved PFS and OS, but the difference was not significant.