showed a trendp = 0.051
As a consequence, the estimated incidence of treatment failure showed a trend to being higher in the everolimus than in the control group (53.2% versus 25.0%, log rank p = 0.051) ( Fig 4 ) ( Table 6 ).
As a consequence, the estimated incidence of treatment failure showed a trend to being higher in the everolimus than in the control group (53.2% versus 25.0%, log rank p = 0.051) ( Fig 4 ) ( Table 6 ).