nominally significantp = 0.02
We could not replicate rs3795128 (20q12) in intracranial volume at Bonferroni-corrected threshold, although it was nominally significant (one-sided p = 0.02) in this dataset.
We could not replicate rs3795128 (20q12) in intracranial volume at Bonferroni-corrected threshold, although it was nominally significant (one-sided p = 0.02) in this dataset.
Of the nine lead SNPs, four are not significant in the original HC study at the nominal level (α = 0.05) but extremely significant for BW and BL, indicating that the significant signals are likely to be driven solely by BL and/or BW instead by HC.