showed a trendP = 0.054
1 c) and PFS ( P = 0.002) in overall DLBCL and showed a trend towards better PFS in ABC-DLBCL ( P = 0.054; Additional file 1 : Figure S6a).
1 c) and PFS ( P = 0.002) in overall DLBCL and showed a trend towards better PFS in ABC-DLBCL ( P = 0.054; Additional file 1 : Figure S6a).
When partitioning DLBCL into GCB and ABC subtypes, the favorable prognostic effect of IGHV SHM high was significant in ABC-DLBCL and marginally significant in BCL2 -R − and MYC -R − GCB-DLBCL (for OS, P = 0.059 and 0.066, respectively; Additional file 1 : Figure S5c-d).
However, the prognostic effect was only significant in the validation set ( P = 0.015; it showed a nonsignificant trend in the training set of ABC-DLBCL, P = 0.15), and the number of cases with long K/LCDR3 length was small (4 and 3 in the training and validation sets, respectively).