Barely Significant
← all excerpts

What does the future hold for ventral rectopexy?: Functional outcome after laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: six-year follow-up of a double-blind, randomised single-centre study.

EClinicalMedicine · 2019 · PMC6890978 · PMID 31832606

1
hedged sentence
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

a clear trendno p-value reported
[1] Although there was a clear trend in favour of resection rectopexy with a recurrence rate of 13% (suture rectopexy 26%, perineal rectosigmoidectomy 24%, Delorme's 31%) there was no significant differences declared in the randomised comparisons although substantial improvements in the quality of life were noted following all procedures.

also in 19,460 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.