Motion tracking of parents' infant- versus adult-directed actions reveals general and action-specific modulations.

Dev Sci · 2020 · PMC6916206 · PMID 31132212

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0980

closest p · 2.0× alpha

0.1280

boldest claim

The sentences

marginal significancep = 0.098so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A main effect of motor evaluation group was found at marginal significance, F (1) = 2.89, p = 0.098, ηp 2 = 0.074, with the average‐motor ability raters covering more distance ( M = 728.27, SE = 9.74) than the high‐motor evaluation group ( M = 545.55, SE = 81.78).

also in 5,069 other papers

failed to reach significancep = 0.128not close (p > 0.1)

A similar effect was found for the red‐press object, infant‐knowledgeable: t (30) = 3.23, p = 0.007, r = 0.51, but the difference between infant and naïve demonstrations failed to reach significance, infant‐naïve: t (30) = 1.92, p = 0.128, r = 0.33.

also in 4,113 other papers

of marginal significanceno p-value reported

Similarly, at a level of marginal significance, parents who rated their infants as being average with respect to motor ability, and thus in more need of assistance, performed larger actions than the high‐motor ability raters.

also in 464 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.