Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals.

Front Hum Neurosci · 2019 · PMC6930908 · PMID 31920601

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0520

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0520

boldest claim

The sentences

only marginally significantp = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The increase in completion time from Auditory trial 5 ( M = 46.68, SD = 11.52) to Auditory trial 6 ( M = 53.96, SD = 11.88) was highly significant ( t (11) = 8.82, p < 0.001), whereas the increase in completion time from Tactile trial 5 ( M = 52.21, SD = 12.03) to Tactile trial 6 ( M = 55.98, SD = 12.22) was only marginally significant ( t (11) = 2.18, p = 0.052).

also in 5,085 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.