Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis With Long-Term Follow-up.

J Am Heart Assoc · 2019 · PMC6951054 · PMID 31826727

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0540

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0540

boldest claim

The sentences

a nonsignificant trendP =0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

After a median follow‐up period of 81 (48–113) months for the CABG group and 96 (53–115) months for the HCR group, there was a nonsignificant trend in survival in favor of HCR (CABG 85% versus HCR 96%; P =0.054) and no difference in freedom from any form of revascularization (CABG 92% versus HCR 91%; P =0.80).

also in 5,406 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

Death, MI, and stroke rates were numerically lower and in favor of HCR, but did not reach statistical significance.

also in 111,027 other papers

an increasing trendno p-value reported

In recent years, there has been an increasing trend toward HCR procedures because of a continuous improvement of the DES performance and because of a broader use of minimally invasive techniques, especially with robotic assistance.

also in 63,971 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.