marginally significantp = 0.051
There was, however, a marginally significant interaction between listening span scores and drug (F(1,99) = 3.912, p = 0.051).
There was, however, a marginally significant interaction between listening span scores and drug (F(1,99) = 3.912, p = 0.051).
A main effect of learning type (F(1,100) = 52.705, p < 0.001) driven by higher win-stay and lose-shift scores for experienced-value ( x ̄ ( σ x ̄ ) = 0.691 (0.009)) relative to inferred-value learning ( x ̄ ( σ x ̄ ) = 0.611 (0.006)), and a marginal main effect of group, which approached significance (F(1,100) = 3.742, p = 0.056), driven by higher win-stay and lose-shift scores for the Non-social ( x ̄ ( σ x ̄ ) = 0.661 (0.007)) relative to Social Group ( x ̄ ( σ x ̄ ) = 0.641 (0.007)).