Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Spontaneous activity in the waiting brain: a marker of impulsive choice in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?

Dev Cogn Neurosci · 2015 · PMC6989780 · PMID 25681956

3
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0700
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.001actually significant
There were highly significant positive correlations between QDQ scores and F-WAIT activity in insula (MNI[ x / y / z ] = −35/20/5; r delay aversion = .57, p < 0.001; r temporal discounting = .57, p < .001) and inferior frontal gyrus (MNI[ x / y / z ] = −35/25/0; r delay aversion = .51, p = 0.001; r temporal discounting = .53, p

also in 132,142 other papers

failed to reach significancep = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
For controls the REST to C-WAIT effect failed to reach significance after stringent control for multiple testing (pseudo t = 6.76, corrected p = 0.07), albeit the attenuations were localized to similar regions.

also in 4,113 other papers

nominally significantno p-value reported
Nominally significant REST to C- and F-WAIT reductions occurred in DMN-related regions, including precuneus, superior parietal lobule, postcentral gyrus and medial frontal gyrus (F-WAIT: pseudo t = 5.07, corrected p = 0.20; C-WAIT: pseudo t = 6.16, corrected p = 0.15) but these were not significant when p values were adjusted for multiple testing.

also in 7,732 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.