Discordance Using High‐Risk Cut Points Finally, when using high‐risk cut points equivalent to LDL‐C 100 mg/dL, we observed a similar effect size of 25% to 40% increased risk in individuals with hsCRP ≥2 versus <2 mg/L, although it did not reach statistical significance (defined as P >0.05) in groups with smaller sample size (Table S6 ).
← all excerpts
High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Discordance With Atherogenic Lipid Measures and Incidence of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Primary Prevention: The ARIC Study.
1
0.0500
0.0500