Finally, studies that used quantitative measurement instruments to assess ED symptomatology, such as EDE-Q or EAT, that had a larger mean effect size ( r + = .364) than the studies that used other instruments ( r + = .177), although this difference was only marginally statistically significant ( p = .077, R 2 = .01).
← all excerpts
The association between muscle dysmorphia and eating disorder symptomatology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
2
0.0770
0.2480
The sentences
In addition, the Egger’s test applied to the intercept of a simple regression model of the effect sizes did not reach statistical significance [intercept = 1.09, t (34) = 1.176, p = .248].