Although the sample sizes were small for this youngest group (18 for conversation and 17 for narration), it is worth noting that none of the 10 t test comparisons of the first and retest scores approached significance, with (uncorrected) p values ranging from .18 to .71 for conversation and .15 to .94 for narration.
← all excerpts
Expressive language sampling as a source of outcome measures for treatment studies in fragile X syndrome: feasibility, practice effects, test-retest reliability, and construct validity.
3
—
—
The sentences
In a few instances, however, an individual parametric test that was significant at p < .05 failed to reach significance in the nonparametric equivalent and vice versa.
There were minimal practice effects, with only a nonsignificant trend (after correction for multiple tests) for an increase in dysfluency from the first to the retest administration in narration for the two older age groups.