Barely Significant
← all excerpts

A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming.

Behav Res Methods · 2012 · PMC7100480 · PMID 22180103

1
hedged sentence
0.0250
closest p · 0.5× alpha
0.0250
boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = .025actually significant
The difference between erroneous responses to unambiguous and ambiguous atypical acronyms known to the participant approached significance, T = 6, p = .025, r = −.23.

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.