Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.

Int J Environ Res Public Health · 2020 · PMC7143495 · PMID 32168947

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

Moreover, a subgroup analysis with Foley catheter plus 25 μg vaginal misoprostol versus 25 μg vaginal misoprostol only also found less hyperstimulation in the combination group, although it did not reach statistical significance.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.