Reasoning and Reading in Adults. A New Reasoning Task for Detecting the Visual Impendance Effect.

Adv Cogn Psychol · 2018 · PMC7183551 · PMID 32351635

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

only marginally significantp = .06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Participants gave more correct responses in neutral problems than in imaginable (92% vs 86%), even though this effect of imaginability was only marginally significant, F (1, 29) = 3.832; η 2 = .117; p = .06.

also in 5,085 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.