Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Randomised trials and meta-analyses of double vs triple antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation-ACS/PCI: A critical appraisal.

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc · 2020 · PMC7229495 · PMID 32435688

3
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

borderline significantno p-value reported
Indeed, in one of the most recent analyses [13] , the odds of ST with DAT vs TAT increased 60%, with a number needed to treat (NNT) for a harmful outcome (NNTH) of 274 and an associated borderline significant increase of MI (NNTH = 151) ( Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 ).

also in 11,409 other papers

a nonsignificant trendno p-value reported
The authors acknowledge ‘a very early numerical increase in ischaemic events in patients without aspirin’, with a nonsignificant trend toward increased risk of MI (HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.72–2.16) and ST (HR 1.32, 0.46–3.79), although the trial was not powered to assess efficacy outcomes ( Table 1 ).

also in 5,406 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported
Unlike DAT with dabigatran 150 mg bid, DAT with dabigatran 110 mg bid showed a trend towards increased rates of MI and ST compared to TAT [1] .

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.