Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Unmasking individual differences in adult reading procedures by disrupting holistic orthographic perception.

PLoS One · 2020 · PMC7250424 · PMID 32453792

4
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0010
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .001actually significant
The 3-way interaction between “group” (i.e., strength of inversion sensitivity in LDT task) x presentation orientation x length remained highly significant and even stronger (t = 6.12, p < .001).

also in 132,142 other papers

approached significanceno p-value reported
No measure even approached significance except comprehension.

also in 8,237 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported
There were also two marginally significant 3-way interactions with Group (Group x Presentation Orientation x Imageability and Group x Presentation Orientation x Biphone Frequency).

also in 26,082 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported
Thus, while individual results must be regarded with caution due to the small sample size and marginal significance, they cohere together as predicted, and suggest that orientation sensitivity can be used as a marker of reading procedures and to unmask reading procedure differences in highly skilled readers.

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.