borderline significantp = 0.053
In addition, participants with MetS had higher dietary GI and GL estimates (in both approaches), with the differences being borderline significant ( p = 0.053, 0.050, and 0.058 for GI 1, GL 1, and GL 2, respectively).
In addition, participants with MetS had higher dietary GI and GL estimates (in both approaches), with the differences being borderline significant ( p = 0.053, 0.050, and 0.058 for GI 1, GL 1, and GL 2, respectively).
Participants with MetS had higher intakes of energy (Kcal/day), carbohydrate (grams per day and percent calories), total sugars (grams per day), and fat (grams per day and percent calories) but these differences did not reach statistical significance.