Barely Significant
← all excerpts

No-reflow phenomenon and comparison to the normal-flow population postprimary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction: case-control study (NORM PPCI).

Open Heart · 2020 · PMC7380712 · PMID 32719072

3
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.5020
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp<0.001actually significant
Baseline TIMI flow did not significantly differ between the cases and control patients; there was a highly significant reduction in final TIMI flow and myocardial blush grade (p<0.001).

also in 132,142 other papers

a numerical trendp=0.502not close (p > 0.1)
In keeping with this, a numerical trend was evident for reduced LV function in the NR cohort; however, this did not reach statistical importance (p=0.502).

also in 1,012 other papers

Patients with NR had a delay across all recorded timings related to symptom onset and important clinical interventions, when compared with the patients who did not, though this failed to reach statistical significance.

also in 6,035 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.